Oh no: Lufthansa wants to buy another airline

Lufthansa Group has submitted a binding offer to the Portuguese state owned enterprise, Parpública ,for a minority stake in TAP Air Portugal, joining Air France-KLM in the final straight of a privatisation process that has dragged on for years. The bid arrived on the 29th July 2026 deadline, with the Portuguese government expected to decide on a winner by September (Reuters, 2026).

Airbus A321-251N CS-TJJ TAP Air

I have watched Lufthansa integrate SWISS, Austrian, Brussels Airlines and, most recently, ITA Airways, and each time the pattern has been the same: preserve the brand, centralise the network, tighten the financial screws. TAP would be different. Not because the playbook would change, but because the prize is uniquely valuable. TAP’s Lisbon hub is the gateway to Brazil and Portuguese-speaking Africa, routes that neither Lufthansa nor Air France-KLM can replicate. The question is not whether Lufthansa can afford it, but whether it can afford to lose it to its Franco-Dutch rival.

What is Lufthansa actually offering Portugal?

The press release leans heavily on Lufthansa’s 70-year history in Portugal, its 353 weekly flights and the promise of over 700 jobs at a new Lufthansa Technik facility in Santa Maria da Feira by 2030 (AirDataNews, 2026). That is a credible industrial pitch, and it is backed by a genuine track record. Lufthansa has already demonstrated with ITA Airways that it can move from a minority stake to effective control: it acquired 41% of the Italian carrier in January 2025 and has since exercised options to take that stake to 90% (Lufthansa Group, 2026). The Portuguese government is selling a 44.9% strategic stake to a partner, with a further 5% reserved for employees, taking the total divested to 49.9% (Euronext, 2026). That leaves the state with a blocking stake, at least for now. But Lufthansa’s history suggests that “minority” is a staging post, not a final destination.

What the press release does not say is that TAP is not a distressed asset in need of a rescue. The airline reported operating revenues of €914.4 million in the first quarter of 2026, an 11% increase year-on-year, and reduced its net loss from €108 million to €39 million over the same period. It has a solid liquidity position of €879.8 million (TAP Air Portugal, 2026). This is not a turnaround project. It is a strategic asset, and Lufthansa knows it.

Why is Air France-KLM the real obstacle here?

This is not a one-horse race. Air France-KLM has submitted its own binding offer for a stake of between 44.9% and 49.9% (Reuters, 2026). The Franco-Dutch group has framed its bid as a comprehensive strategic plan covering passenger transport, cargo, loyalty and MRO, with a particular emphasis on developing maintenance activities alongside TAP’s existing engineering arm. Both groups have been described by the Portuguese government as having submitted initial offers that were “largely equivalent and very ambitious” across strategic, industrial and financial criteria (Euronext, 2026).

Infrastructure Minister Miguel Pinto Luz has been clear that price alone will not decide this (Euronext, 2026). That is convenient for Lufthansa, which may not be able to outbid Air France-KLM on cash alone. But it also introduces uncertainty. The government wants a partner that will strengthen operations not just at Lisbon, but across Porto, Faro, the Azores and Madeira. Lufthansa’s proposal emphasises Lisbon as a “strategic hub” for the South Atlantic. Air France-KLM’s counter-proposal positions Lisbon as its “unique Southern European hub” (Air France-KLM, 2026). Both are saying the same thing in different accents.

What does this mean for passengers flying from the UK?

For the average traveller, the immediate impact is invisible. TAP continues to operate its schedule, and the Portuguese state retains control for now. But over the medium term, the choice of buyer will shape connectivity. Lufthansa’s network would feed TAP’s Lisbon hub from its European strongholds in Frankfurt, Munich, Zurich and Vienna. Air France-KLM would route traffic through Paris and Amsterdam. Both would expand TAP’s reach, but in different directions.

The real battleground is the South Atlantic. TAP’s slots to Brazil are its most valuable asset, and both groups want them. Lufthansa has no meaningful presence in Latin America; TAP would give it an instant connection. Air France-KLM already has a strong Brazilian network through its partnership with GOL (Air France-KLM, 2023), but TAP would add a direct Lisbon-Rio or Lisbon-São Paulo flow that neither Paris nor Amsterdam can match. The winner gets a new continent. The loser watches from the other side of the Atlantic.

Plane approaching stand at Gatwick South Terminal
Plane approaching stand at Gatwick South Terminal by David Martin is licensed under CC-BY-SA 2.0

There is also a less discussed risk: integration fatigue. Lufthansa is in the middle of pulling its existing hub airlines closer together, centralising network planning, finance and technology while keeping customer-facing functions local. Adding TAP to that mix, while simultaneously digesting ITA Airways, is a lot of moving parts. The Group has form here, but even a proven operator can overreach.

I am not convinced that TAP needs saving, but it does need an effective partner. The Portuguese government has made that case itself, warning that EU state-aid rules prevent further public funding and leave the airline exposed to future shocks. That is a fair point. But it is also a reminder that this privatisation is driven as much by Brussels as by Lisbon. The winner will not just be buying an airline; it will be buying a political settlement.

Lufthansa’s bid is serious, well-resourced and backed by a credible industrial plan. But so is Air France-KLM’s. The decision will come down to which group can convince the Portuguese government that its vision for TAP is not just about routes and revenues, but about the country itself. On that measure, Lufthansa’s long-standing operational presence in the country gives it an edge. But history is not the same as a strategy, and strategy is what the government says it wants. I think Lufthansa has the stronger case, but I would not bet against Air France-KLM’s ability to deliver a compelling counter-punch. Either way, TAP is about to become a lot more interesting.

pexels-photo-38642240.jpeg
Photo by Grzegorz Lewandowski on Pexels.com

Comments

Leave a Reply

Discover more from CallumElsdon.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from CallumElsdon.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading